In The Tipping Point, Malcolm Gladwell talks about the phenomenon that is evident in the animal kingdom, as well in our communities today. When violence is considered, it seems that there is more in higher populations in bigger metropolitan areas. You can see in this specific book, that Malcolm uses animals to express how smaller populations that tend to be large, end up seeing more violence and there are many people who agree with this ideology because it shows in many of these cities. I believe many of us will agree that while it's actuality for an act of violence to occur in the countryside, the probability of witnessing an act of violence is greater in the city.
Could we work as a unit to find a solution to this problem? Most people would most likely agree that they would defend themselves, or others from violence. If someone feels as if they are threatened, they could also fight against someone using violent force in retaliation. Does this kind of mental outlook really make any actual change? The thought process on this type of reaction doesn't seem to be effective since two sides fighting using violence always turns out bad.
If you are the type of person who advocates non-violence and believes in it, you generally have a great amount of moral fiber and you stand for the things you believe in. NXIVM is an organization that allows people to find meaningful morals and ethics. Sara Bronfman has a center recently located in New York City. Since this is a large city, we can see the results of ethics as they play out in everyday life in regards to violence.
Is there a positive affect from moral fiber instilled in some of the people who live in this populated city location? Well, ethics are a human's internal guide. One of the simplest ways to tell if a person has good ethical beliefs is how they portray it through their lives. If a person's ethics are not clearly defined, a person might find themselves conflicted often about what they will or won't decide to do. If someone's ethical code is strong, it is likely that this person will have an idea of how to handle challenging situations as they occur. They are more likely to be consistent and feel a sensation of surety about their decision.
There is a reason that people feel conflicted in regards to violence. Injuring someone or stealing from someone is something most of us wouldn't even consider. There truly is no reason for taking another person's life, either, as ending a life goes against everything ethical. How is it possible? Is it possible we are not instinctively violent individuals? How could a strong sense of ethics assist us in making more solid decisions about violence - even in a violent society? Is violence a learned thing -- and if so, can it be unlearned? I think exploring ethics is a worthwhile way to determine that for oneself.
Could we work as a unit to find a solution to this problem? Most people would most likely agree that they would defend themselves, or others from violence. If someone feels as if they are threatened, they could also fight against someone using violent force in retaliation. Does this kind of mental outlook really make any actual change? The thought process on this type of reaction doesn't seem to be effective since two sides fighting using violence always turns out bad.
If you are the type of person who advocates non-violence and believes in it, you generally have a great amount of moral fiber and you stand for the things you believe in. NXIVM is an organization that allows people to find meaningful morals and ethics. Sara Bronfman has a center recently located in New York City. Since this is a large city, we can see the results of ethics as they play out in everyday life in regards to violence.
Is there a positive affect from moral fiber instilled in some of the people who live in this populated city location? Well, ethics are a human's internal guide. One of the simplest ways to tell if a person has good ethical beliefs is how they portray it through their lives. If a person's ethics are not clearly defined, a person might find themselves conflicted often about what they will or won't decide to do. If someone's ethical code is strong, it is likely that this person will have an idea of how to handle challenging situations as they occur. They are more likely to be consistent and feel a sensation of surety about their decision.
There is a reason that people feel conflicted in regards to violence. Injuring someone or stealing from someone is something most of us wouldn't even consider. There truly is no reason for taking another person's life, either, as ending a life goes against everything ethical. How is it possible? Is it possible we are not instinctively violent individuals? How could a strong sense of ethics assist us in making more solid decisions about violence - even in a violent society? Is violence a learned thing -- and if so, can it be unlearned? I think exploring ethics is a worthwhile way to determine that for oneself.
About the Author:
Whenever you are curious to find out more contact Sara Bronfman. As a second option you can also visit Sara Bronfman programs.
No comments:
Post a Comment